Re: RLS 9.5rc1 configuration changes?

From: Ted Toth <txtoth(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RLS 9.5rc1 configuration changes?
Date: 2016-01-04 23:09:29
Message-ID: CAFPpqQEn+3oQ4qQMD2BotB2snGAdxvZC7CNG8KAB4vwzWFwAHA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Ted Toth <txtoth(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> I had been using CrunchyDatas 9.4 with backported RLS but I decided
>> since my ultimate target is 9.5 that I update to it. However now the
>> function called for the SELECT policy is not being called. \dt shows
>> the policy but EXPLAIN ANALYZE of a select doesn't show the filter.
>
> I'm not sure how Crunchy's 9.4 version behaves, but I'd expect the
> policy USING condition to be visible in EXPLAIN in 9.5.
>
> Are you perhaps testing this as a superuser? Superusers bypass RLS
> even with FORCE ROW LEVEL SECURITY.

Yes I was a Superuser but without 'Bypass RLS'. So there's no way to
enforce RLS for all users/roles?

>
>> ... The only
>> changes I made for 9.5 were to no longer set row_security to 'force'
>> in postgresql.conf
>
> What did you set it to instead?

row_security=on. Maybe 'force' did what I wanted in Crunchy's 9.4 version :(

>
> regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2016-01-04 23:21:51 Re: to_timestamp alternatives
Previous Message Edson Richter 2016-01-04 23:02:44 Re: BDR and TX obeyance