From: | Ted Toth <txtoth(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: rhel6 rpm file locations |
Date: | 2015-05-27 19:25:46 |
Message-ID: | CAFPpqQEYfmWfzk6-FdafGCm_V8fWvZSfLE-+vXEaaGDGM2Td=Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
http://yum.postgresql.org/9.4/redhat/rhel-6.5-x86_64/
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Ted Toth <txtoth(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I'm trying to use a newer version than is available from RH in our
>> custom distro but am having problems install both x86_64 and i686 rpms
>> because file conflicts. We have some i686 packages that use libgdal
>> which pulls in libpq which ends up in the same location in both the
>> x86_64 and i686 postgresql lib and devel rpms. Why doesn't postgresql
>> use _libdir and other standard rpm macros?
>
> From where did you get the RPMs that you are using?
>
> There is more than one set, and they are maintained by different people.
>
> --
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-05-27 19:39:14 | Re: problems on Solaris |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-05-27 18:55:09 | Re: Run pgindent now? |