Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions

From: Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Date: 2021-03-20 04:38:51
Message-ID: CAFPTHDbW-vo3D6+kZudYugZag+PvEKLWGuiw5cdM1Sw6K_yKWA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 1:35 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 5:03 AM Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > Missed the patch - 0001, resending.
> >
>
> I have made miscellaneous changes in the patch which includes
> improving comments, error messages, and miscellaneous coding
> improvements. The most notable one is that we don't need an additional
> parameter in walrcv_startstreaming, if the two_phase option is set
> properly. My changes are in v63-0002-Misc-changes-by-Amit, if you are
> fine with those, then please merge them in the next version. I have
> omitted the dev-logs patch but feel free to submit it. I have one
> question:
>
>
I am fine with these changes. I see that Peter has already merged in these
changes.

thanks,
Ajin Cherian
Fujitsu Australia

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2021-03-20 04:39:10 Re: pg_upgrade failing for 200+ million Large Objects
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2021-03-20 04:06:51 Re: a verbose option for autovacuum