Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?

From: Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?
Date: 2021-02-12 01:48:32
Message-ID: CAFPTHDay+Y-HFzCK84WeZXuPa62mZ8jqhz7bH+GhXGCbaweH5w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 10:38 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Okay, attached an updated patch with only that change.

I ran Erik's test suite [1] on this patch overnight and found no
errors. No more comments from me. The patch looks good.

regards,
Ajin Cherian
Fujitsu Australia

[1]- https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/93d02794068482f96d31b002e0eb248d%40xs4all.nl

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2021-02-12 01:48:37 pg13.2: invalid memory alloc request size NNNN
Previous Message Greg Nancarrow 2021-02-12 01:37:06 Re: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority