Re: Decoding of two-phase xacts missing from CREATE_REPLICATION_SLOT command

From: Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Kapila <akapila(at)postgresql(dot)org>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Decoding of two-phase xacts missing from CREATE_REPLICATION_SLOT command
Date: 2021-06-11 10:26:02
Message-ID: CAFPTHDZJj976MDwCqr4b6Lep+UupjrzRcY1ZcjV6fQSwttEqbw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 8:14 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 2:04 PM Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
>
> The new patches look mostly good apart from the below cosmetic issues.
> I think the question is whether we want to do these for PG-14 or
> postpone them till PG-15. I think these don't appear to be risky
> changes so we can get them in PG-14 as that might help some outside
> core solutions as appears to be the case for Jeff. The changes related
> to start_replication are too specific to the subscriber-side solution
> so we can postpone those along with the subscriber-side 2PC work.
> Jeff, Ajin, what do you think?
>

Since we are exposing two-phase decoding using the
pg_create_replication_slot API, I think
it is reasonable to expose CREATE_REPLICATION_SLOT as well. We can
leave the subscriber side changes
for PG-15.

> Also, I can take care of the below cosmetic issues before committing
> if we decide to do this for PG-14.

Thanks,

Regards,
Ajin Cherian
Fujitsu Australia

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2021-06-11 11:04:36 Re: PoC/WIP: Extended statistics on expressions
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2021-06-11 10:13:56 Re: Decoding of two-phase xacts missing from CREATE_REPLICATION_SLOT command