From: | Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Kapila <akapila(at)postgresql(dot)org>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Decoding of two-phase xacts missing from CREATE_REPLICATION_SLOT command |
Date: | 2021-06-11 10:26:02 |
Message-ID: | CAFPTHDZJj976MDwCqr4b6Lep+UupjrzRcY1ZcjV6fQSwttEqbw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 8:14 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 2:04 PM Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
>
> The new patches look mostly good apart from the below cosmetic issues.
> I think the question is whether we want to do these for PG-14 or
> postpone them till PG-15. I think these don't appear to be risky
> changes so we can get them in PG-14 as that might help some outside
> core solutions as appears to be the case for Jeff. The changes related
> to start_replication are too specific to the subscriber-side solution
> so we can postpone those along with the subscriber-side 2PC work.
> Jeff, Ajin, what do you think?
>
Since we are exposing two-phase decoding using the
pg_create_replication_slot API, I think
it is reasonable to expose CREATE_REPLICATION_SLOT as well. We can
leave the subscriber side changes
for PG-15.
> Also, I can take care of the below cosmetic issues before committing
> if we decide to do this for PG-14.
Thanks,
Regards,
Ajin Cherian
Fujitsu Australia
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2021-06-11 11:04:36 | Re: PoC/WIP: Extended statistics on expressions |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2021-06-11 10:13:56 | Re: Decoding of two-phase xacts missing from CREATE_REPLICATION_SLOT command |