From: | Niyas Sait <niyas(dot)sait(at)linaro(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Add native windows on arm64 support |
Date: | 2022-04-21 09:21:04 |
Message-ID: | CAFPTBD8Mk0X3h0UhWDbN7dLf1-eFeqcE8Qe3SUKzH9b+Gj1kBg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Why does it not allow that? Is that just a limitation of the
> compiler? If yes, what is the error happening? This question is not
> exactly answered yet as of this thread. I may be missing a reference
> about that in the upstream docs, but I see nowhere an explanation
> about the reason and the why. That's also one of the first questions
> from Thomas upthread.
The following error occurs:
LINK : fatal error LNK1246: '/DYNAMICBASE:NO' not compatible with 'ARM64'
target machine; link without '/DYNAMICBASE:NO
This seems to be a deliberate restriction for Arm64 targets. However, no
references were provided. To clarify, I have posted a question [1] on the
community channel of Visual Studio.
Niyas
[1]
https://developercommunity.visualstudio.com/t/LINK-:-fatal-error-LNK1246:-DYNAMICBAS/10020163
On Thu, 21 Apr 2022 at 05:07, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 10:43:06AM +0100, Niyas Sait wrote:
> >> This issue is still lying around, and you may have been lucky. Would
> >> there be any issues to remove this change to get a basic support in?
> >> As mentioned upthread, there is a long history of Postgres with ASLR.
> >
> > MSVC linker doesn't allow non-random base addresses for Arm64 platforms.
> > It is needed for basic support.
>
> Why does it not allow that? Is that just a limitation of the
> compiler? If yes, what is the error happening? This question is not
> exactly answered yet as of this thread. I may be missing a reference
> about that in the upstream docs, but I see nowhere an explanation
> about the reason and the why. That's also one of the first questions
> from Thomas upthread.
> --
> Michael
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2022-04-21 09:41:00 | Re: Data is copied twice when specifying both child and parent table in publication |
Previous Message | Yura Sokolov | 2022-04-21 09:04:46 | Re: BufferAlloc: don't take two simultaneous locks |