Re: [pgAdmin4][Patch]: RM #3077 - ERROR: invalid byte sequence for encoding "LATIN1":0x00

From: Khushboo Vashi <khushboo(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Joao De Almeida Pereira <jdealmeidapereira(at)pivotal(dot)io>, pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgAdmin4][Patch]: RM #3077 - ERROR: invalid byte sequence for encoding "LATIN1":0x00
Date: 2018-02-23 04:15:02
Message-ID: CAFOhELd2q4BFnztD83At2ZYE0S0u-QQhYChk+QtCR0jz5noiEQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 5:32 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 4:11 AM, Khushboo Vashi <
> khushboo(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 10:51 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 3:45 PM, Joao De Almeida Pereira <
>>> jdealmeidapereira(at)pivotal(dot)io> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>> The patch looks good, do we have any example error that we can test in
>>>> order to ensure the problem no longer shows up in the future?
>>>> If they could be Unit Tests instead of Feature tests that would be
>>>> awesome, because Feature tests are much more expensive then Unit.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I think we need to consider a couple of options here:
>>>
>>> 1) Make sure that many/all of our tests use non-ASCII names.
>>>
>>> +1
>>
>>> 2) Consider adding a mechanism to allow running the regression tests
>>> with overridden GUC values. For example, a parameter in the test config
>>> file that gives a set of GUCs to change upon connection.
>>>
>>> The downside of 2 of course, is that it adds a huge amount of possible
>>> environment combinations to test.
>>>
>>> We should implement this as it would be very helpful in reducing the
>> testing efforts.
>> But as you said there will be large set of combinations, so first we need
>> to come up with the possible combinations which we would like to include
>> first.
>>
>
> Well, we could just update the framework to include a list of GUCs and
> values in the JSON config, then we can test in different configs as needed.
>
> Sure. I will create one ticket for the same.

>
> --
> Dave Page
> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> Twitter: @pgsnake
>
> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Khushboo Vashi 2018-02-23 04:20:03 Re: [pgAdmin4][Patch]: RM #3077 - ERROR: invalid byte sequence for encoding "LATIN1":0x00
Previous Message Joao De Almeida Pereira 2018-02-22 21:04:01 Re: [pgadmin4] PEP-8 on pgadmin/tools