Re: [pgadmin4][Patch]: Test cases for the backup module

From: Khushboo Vashi <khushboo(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Victoria Henry <vhenry(at)pivotal(dot)io>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Joao De Almeida Pereira <jdealmeidapereira(at)pivotal(dot)io>, pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgadmin4][Patch]: Test cases for the backup module
Date: 2018-06-06 05:12:38
Message-ID: CAFOhELc6zT5pLHJTWd68q=jn3rhBjROUAKi5DneURdd7=B0VqA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

Hi Dave,

As per our discussion I have added the code to clean up the generated files.
Please find the attached updated patch.

Thanks,
Khushboo

On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 9:37 AM, Khushboo Vashi <
khushboo(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:

> Hi Victoria,
>
> As per the logs, Restore job is failing only for GPDB. As I don't have
> setup for the greenplum database, can you please check this functionality
> works well in pgAdmin4 with GPDB?
>
> Thanks,
> Khushboo
>
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 5:13 AM, Victoria Henry <vhenry(at)pivotal(dot)io> wrote:
>
>> Hi Khushboo
>>
>> The tests are still failing and seems flaky:
>> https://gpdb-dev.bosh.pivotalci.info/teams/pgadmin/pipelines
>> /pgadmin-patch/jobs/run-tests/builds/113
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Victoria
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 4:50 AM Khushboo Vashi <
>> khushboo(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 2:09 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 9:37 AM, Khushboo Vashi <
>>>> khushboo(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 1:36 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 4:39 AM, Khushboo Vashi <
>>>>>> khushboo(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 8:41 PM, Joao De Almeida Pereira <
>>>>>>> jdealmeidapereira(at)pivotal(dot)io> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Khushboo,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Some tests are failing in greenplum:
>>>>>>>> https://gpdb-dev.bosh.pivotalci.info/teams/pgadmin/pipelines
>>>>>>>> /pgadmin-patch/jobs/run-tests/builds/108
>>>>>>>> The piece of code responsible for the error is:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> if server['default_binary_paths'] is not None:
>>>>>>>> test_utils.set_preference(server['default_binary_paths'])
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> config.DEFAULT_BINARY_PATHS = {
>>>>>>>> "pg": str(server['default_binary_paths']['pg']),
>>>>>>>> "ppas": str(server['default_binary_paths']['ppas']),
>>>>>>>> "gpdb": ""
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Can you send me the test_config.json file? The above code sets the
>>>>>>> paths to the SQLite database and through the logs couldn't figure out the
>>>>>>> exact failure.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It seems clear from the code shown that it's not setting the binary
>>>>>> paths for gpdb database servers. Shouldn't it be something like:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> config.DEFAULT_BINARY_PATHS = {
>>>>>> "pg": str(server['default_binary_paths']['pg']),
>>>>>> "ppas": str(server['default_binary_paths']['ppas']),
>>>>>> "gpdb": str(server['default_binary_paths']['gpdb'])
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Without this code, the test cases should work as I already set paths
>>>>> through below code.
>>>>>
>>>>> test_utils.set_preference(server['default_binary_paths'])
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> In that case, why is the code above required at all?
>>>>
>>>> My bad. Removed this code and also updated set_preference function for
>>> greenplum database.
>>> Please find the attached updated patch.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> test_backup_utils.py file name is misleading, these are not tests,
>>>>>>>> are helpers.
>>>>>>>> ​
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>> Victoria & Joao
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 1:36 AM Khushboo Vashi <
>>>>>>>> khushboo(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jun 2, 2018 at 3:01 AM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This looks good, except that it's leaving the
>>>>>>>>>> test_restore_database behind. Can we clean that up please?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> PFA updated patch.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 7:06 AM, Khushboo Vashi <
>>>>>>>>>> khushboo(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Victoria,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for reviewing the patch.
>>>>>>>>>>> The tests were failing due to the latest commit
>>>>>>>>>>> #2b4605a9d390cb44e5dfe9967c3adf2b28d04f1f - Ensure
>>>>>>>>>>> backup/restore/maintenance work via SSH tunnels. Fixes #3355
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I have fixed the issues and attached the updated patch.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>> Khushboo
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 10:00 PM, Victoria Henry <
>>>>>>>>>>> vhenry(at)pivotal(dot)io> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi there,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> We've been noticing some issues with the tests on both our CI
>>>>>>>>>>>> and local Mac workstations.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. When the following code blocks are invoked - we get
>>>>>>>>>>>> plenty of app.context() issues. It must not be valid when
>>>>>>>>>>>> running tests.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ​
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> from pgadmin.utils.driver import get_driver
>>>>>>>>>>>> driver = get_driver(PG_DEFAULT_DRIVER)
>>>>>>>>>>>> manager = driver.connection_manager(self.sid)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> host = manager.local_bind_host if manager.use_ssh_tunnel else s.host
>>>>>>>>>>>> port = manager.local_bind_port if manager.use_ssh_tunnel else s.port
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. When we finally enable
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "default_binary_paths": {
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> in our test_config, we get more failing tests that look like:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ======================================================================
>>>>>>>>>>>> FAIL: runTest (pgadmin.tools.restore.tests.test_restore_create_job_unit_test.RestoreCreateJobTest)
>>>>>>>>>>>> When restore object with option - Miscellaneous
>>>>>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>>>>>>>>>> File "/Users/pivotal/.pyenv/versions/3.6.5/lib/python3.6/unittest/mock.py", line 1179, in patched
>>>>>>>>>>>> return func(*args, **keywargs)
>>>>>>>>>>>> File "/Users/pivotal/workspace/pgadmin4/web/pgadmin/tools/restore/tests/test_restore_create_job_unit_test.py", line 295, in runTest
>>>>>>>>>>>> self.assertEquals(response.status_code, 200)
>>>>>>>>>>>> AssertionError: 410 != 200
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> And
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> When restore object with the sections options ... 2018-05-31 12:24:42,988: ERROR pgadmin: illegal environment variable name
>>>>>>>>>>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>>>>>>>>>> File "/Users/pivotal/workspace/pgadmin4/web/pgadmin/tools/restore/__init__.py", line 352, in create_restore_job
>>>>>>>>>>>> manager.export_password_env(p.id)
>>>>>>>>>>>> File "/Users/pivotal/workspace/pgadmin4/web/pgadmin/utils/driver/psycopg2/server_manager.py", line 365, in export_password_env
>>>>>>>>>>>> os.environ[str(env)] = password
>>>>>>>>>>>> File "/Users/pivotal/.pyenv/versions/3.6.5/lib/python3.6/os.py", line 675, in __setitem__
>>>>>>>>>>>> self.putenv(key, value)
>>>>>>>>>>>> ValueError: illegal environment variable name
>>>>>>>>>>>> FAIL
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ​
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Victoria && Anthony
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 1:16 AM Khushboo Vashi <
>>>>>>>>>>>> khushboo(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please find the attached updated patch with the fixes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The test cases were only failing on MAC not on Linux.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Khushboo
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 10:13 AM, Khushboo Vashi <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> khushboo(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 1:05 AM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 8:09 AM, Khushboo Vashi <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> khushboo(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> please find the attached updated patch for the test cases
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of Backup, Restore and Maintenance modules which includes:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Unit test cases
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. End to end regression test cases
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Feature test cases
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks. I've yet to be able to run the feature tests
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> successfully. Here's what I've found so far:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) DEFAULT_BINARY_PATHS should be default_binary_paths in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the JSON config file.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Will do.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) I've hit screensize related issues:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ============================================================
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==========
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ERROR: runTest (pgadmin.feature_tests.pg_util
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ities_maintenance_test.PGUtilitiesMaintenanceFeatureTest)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Test for PG maintenance: database
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ----------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> File "/Users/dpage/git/pgadmin4/web
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /pgadmin/feature_tests/pg_utilities_maintenance_test.py",
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> line 56, in runTest
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> self._open_maintenance_dialogue()
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> File "/Users/dpage/git/pgadmin4/web
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /pgadmin/feature_tests/pg_utilities_maintenance_test.py",
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> line 75, in _open_maintenance_dialogue
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "*[.='" + self.table_name +
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "']/../*[(at)class='aciTreeItem'"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> File "/Users/dpage/.virtualenvs/pga
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dmin4/lib/python2.7/site-packages/selenium/webdriver/remote/webelement.py",
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> line 80, in click
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> self._execute(Command.CLICK_ELEMENT)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> File "/Users/dpage/.virtualenvs/pga
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dmin4/lib/python2.7/site-packages/selenium/webdriver/remote/webelement.py",
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> line 628, in _execute
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> return self._parent.execute(command, params)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> File "/Users/dpage/.virtualenvs/pga
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dmin4/lib/python2.7/site-packages/selenium/webdriver/remote/webdriver.py",
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> line 312, in execute
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> self.error_handler.check_response(response)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> File "/Users/dpage/.virtualenvs/pga
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dmin4/lib/python2.7/site-packages/selenium/webdriver/remote/errorhandler.py",
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> line 242, in check_response
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> raise exception_class(message, screen, stacktrace)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WebDriverException: Message: unknown error: Element <span
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> class="aciTreeItem">...</span> is not clickable at point (223, 604). Other
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> element would receive the click: <div class="wcFrameCenter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wcPanelBackground wcScrollableX wcScrollableY" style="left: 0px; right:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0px; bottom: 0px;">...</div>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Session info: chrome=66.0.3359.181)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Driver info: chromedriver=2.38.552518
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (183d19265345f54ce39cbb94cf81ba5f15905011),platform=Mac OS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> X 10.12.6 x86_64)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) One time the test did start, but then I saw this failure:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ============================================================
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ==========
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ERROR: runTest (pgadmin.feature_tests.pg_util
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ities_backup_restore_test.PGUtilitiesBackupFeatureTest)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Test for PG utilities - Backup and Restore
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ----------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> File "/Users/dpage/git/pgadmin4/web
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /pgadmin/feature_tests/pg_utilities_backup_restore_test.py",
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> line 93, in runTest
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> self.page.fill_input_by_field_name("file",
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "test_backup_file")
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> File "/Users/dpage/git/pgadmin4/web
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /regression/feature_utils/pgadmin_page.py", line 211, in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fill_input_by_field_name
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> self.wait_for_input_field_content(field_name,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> field_content)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> File "/Users/dpage/git/pgadmin4/web
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /regression/feature_utils/pgadmin_page.py", line 251, in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wait_for_input_field_content
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "field to contain '" + str(content) + "'",
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> input_field_has_content
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> File "/Users/dpage/git/pgadmin4/web
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /regression/feature_utils/pgadmin_page.py", line 337, in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _wait_for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Timed out waiting for " + waiting_for_message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> File "/Users/dpage/.virtualenvs/pga
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dmin4/lib/python2.7/site-packages/selenium/webdriver/support/wait.py",
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> line 80, in until
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> raise TimeoutException(message, screen, stacktrace)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TimeoutException: Message: Timed out waiting for field to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contain 'test_backup_file'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (with screenshot attached)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have ran the feature tests with multiple servers many
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> times but didn't get a single failure.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have asked Akshay to run on his machine, let see what he
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gets.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Khushboo
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 9:40 PM, Joao De Almeida Pereira <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jdealmeidapereira(at)pivotal(dot)io> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Khushboo,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We reviewed the patch and it is very nice to see some more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> coverage in this area. Good job :D
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We passed the tests through our CI the feature tests are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not passing, but the linter fails:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./pgadmin/feature_tests/pg_utilities_backup_test.py:37: [E501] line too long (91 > 79 characters)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://gpdb-dev.bosh.pivotalci.info/teams/pgadmin/pipelines/pgadmin-patch/jobs/run-linter/builds/17#L5ad0f3d8:265>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./pgadmin/feature_tests/pg_utilities_backup_test.py:53: [E501] line too long (104 > 79 characters)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://gpdb-dev.bosh.pivotalci.info/teams/pgadmin/pipelines/pgadmin-patch/jobs/run-linter/builds/17#L5ad0f3d8:266>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./pgadmin/feature_tests/pg_utilities_backup_test.py:59: [E501] line too long (85 > 79 characters)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://gpdb-dev.bosh.pivotalci.info/teams/pgadmin/pipelines/pgadmin-patch/jobs/run-linter/builds/17#L5ad0f3d8:267>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./pgadmin/feature_tests/pg_utilities_backup_test.py:62: [E501] line too long (96 > 79 characters)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://gpdb-dev.bosh.pivotalci.info/teams/pgadmin/pipelines/pgadmin-patch/jobs/run-linter/builds/17#L5ad0f3d8:268>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./pgadmin/feature_tests/pg_utilities_backup_test.py:63: [E501] line too long (91 > 79 characters)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://gpdb-dev.bosh.pivotalci.info/teams/pgadmin/pipelines/pgadmin-patch/jobs/run-linter/builds/17#L5ad0f3d8:269>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./pgadmin/feature_tests/pg_utilities_backup_test.py:70: [E501] line too long (118 > 79 characters)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://gpdb-dev.bosh.pivotalci.info/teams/pgadmin/pipelines/pgadmin-patch/jobs/run-linter/builds/17#L5ad0f3d8:270>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./pgadmin/tools/backup/tests/test_backup_message.py:37: [E121] continuation line under-indented for hanging indent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://gpdb-dev.bosh.pivotalci.info/teams/pgadmin/pipelines/pgadmin-patch/jobs/run-linter/builds/17#L5ad0f3d8:271>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./pgadmin/tools/backup/tests/test_backup_message.py:48: [E122] continuation line missing indentation or outdented
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://gpdb-dev.bosh.pivotalci.info/teams/pgadmin/pipelines/pgadmin-patch/jobs/run-linter/builds/17#L5ad0f3d8:272>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./pgadmin/tools/backup/tests/test_backup_message.py:49: [E251] unexpected spaces around keyword / parameter equals
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://gpdb-dev.bosh.pivotalci.info/teams/pgadmin/pipelines/pgadmin-patch/jobs/run-linter/builds/17#L5ad0f3d8:273>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./pgadmin/tools/backup/tests/test_backup_message.py:49: [E251] unexpected spaces around keyword / parameter equals
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://gpdb-dev.bosh.pivotalci.info/teams/pgadmin/pipelines/pgadmin-patch/jobs/run-linter/builds/17#L5ad0f3d8:274>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./pgadmin/tools/backup/tests/test_backup_message.py:51: [E501] line too long (91 > 79 characters)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://gpdb-dev.bosh.pivotalci.info/teams/pgadmin/pipelines/pgadmin-patch/jobs/run-linter/builds/17#L5ad0f3d8:275>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./pgadmin/tools/backup/tests/test_backup_message.py:52: [E501] line too long (94 > 79 characters)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://gpdb-dev.bosh.pivotalci.info/teams/pgadmin/pipelines/pgadmin-patch/jobs/run-linter/builds/17#L5ad0f3d8:276>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./pgadmin/tools/backup/tests/test_backup_message.py:53: [E501] line too long (108 > 79 characters)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://gpdb-dev.bosh.pivotalci.info/teams/pgadmin/pipelines/pgadmin-patch/jobs/run-linter/builds/17#L5ad0f3d8:277>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./pgadmin/tools/backup/tests/test_backup_message.py:81: [E501] line too long (113 > 79 characters)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://gpdb-dev.bosh.pivotalci.info/teams/pgadmin/pipelines/pgadmin-patch/jobs/run-linter/builds/17#L5ad0f3d8:278>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./pgadmin/tools/backup/tests/test_backup_message.py:82: [E501] line too long (94 > 79 characters)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://gpdb-dev.bosh.pivotalci.info/teams/pgadmin/pipelines/pgadmin-patch/jobs/run-linter/builds/17#L5ad0f3d8:279>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./pgadmin/tools/backup/tests/test_backup_message.py:83: [E501] line too long (108 > 79 characters)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://gpdb-dev.bosh.pivotalci.info/teams/pgadmin/pipelines/pgadmin-patch/jobs/run-linter/builds/17#L5ad0f3d8:280>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./pgadmin/tools/backup/tests/test_backup_message.py:111: [E501] line too long (100 > 79 characters)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://gpdb-dev.bosh.pivotalci.info/teams/pgadmin/pipelines/pgadmin-patch/jobs/run-linter/builds/17#L5ad0f3d8:281>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./pgadmin/tools/backup/tests/test_backup_message.py:113: [E501] line too long (94 > 79 characters)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://gpdb-dev.bosh.pivotalci.info/teams/pgadmin/pipelines/pgadmin-patch/jobs/run-linter/builds/17#L5ad0f3d8:282>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./pgadmin/tools/backup/tests/test_backup_message.py:114: [E501] line too long (108 > 79 characters)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://gpdb-dev.bosh.pivotalci.info/teams/pgadmin/pipelines/pgadmin-patch/jobs/run-linter/builds/17#L5ad0f3d8:283>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./pgadmin/tools/backup/tests/test_backup_message.py:147: [E501] line too long (93 > 79 characters)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://gpdb-dev.bosh.pivotalci.info/teams/pgadmin/pipelines/pgadmin-patch/jobs/run-linter/builds/17#L5ad0f3d8:284>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./pgadmin/tools/backup/tests/test_batch_process.py:40: [E121] continuation line under-indented for hanging indent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://gpdb-dev.bosh.pivotalci.info/teams/pgadmin/pipelines/pgadmin-patch/jobs/run-linter/builds/17#L5ad0f3d8:285>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./pgadmin/tools/backup/tests/test_batch_process.py:51: [E122] continuation line missing indentation or outdented
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://gpdb-dev.bosh.pivotalci.info/teams/pgadmin/pipelines/pgadmin-patch/jobs/run-linter/builds/17#L5ad0f3d8:286>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./pgadmin/tools/backup/tests/test_batch_process.py:135: [E501] line too long (80 > 79 characters)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://gpdb-dev.bosh.pivotalci.info/teams/pgadmin/pipelines/pgadmin-patch/jobs/run-linter/builds/17#L5ad0f3d8:287>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./pgadmin/tools/backup/tests/test_batch_process.py:137: [E501] line too long (83 > 79 characters)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://gpdb-dev.bosh.pivotalci.info/teams/pgadmin/pipelines/pgadmin-patch/jobs/run-linter/builds/17#L5ad0f3d8:288>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./pgadmin/tools/backup/tests/test_batch_process.py:138: [E122] continuation line missing indentation or outdented
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://gpdb-dev.bosh.pivotalci.info/teams/pgadmin/pipelines/pgadmin-patch/jobs/run-linter/builds/17#L5ad0f3d8:289>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./pgadmin/tools/backup/tests/test_batch_process.py:139: [E122] continuation line missing indentation or outdented
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://gpdb-dev.bosh.pivotalci.info/teams/pgadmin/pipelines/pgadmin-patch/jobs/run-linter/builds/17#L5ad0f3d8:290>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./pgadmin/tools/backup/tests/test_batch_process.py:140: [E122] continuation line missing indentation or outdented
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://gpdb-dev.bosh.pivotalci.info/teams/pgadmin/pipelines/pgadmin-patch/jobs/run-linter/builds/17#L5ad0f3d8:291>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./pgadmin/tools/backup/tests/test_batch_process.py:191: [E501] line too long (81 > 79 characters)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://gpdb-dev.bosh.pivotalci.info/teams/pgadmin/pipelines/pgadmin-patch/jobs/run-linter/builds/17#L5ad0f3d8:292>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./pgadmin/tools/backup/tests/test_batch_process.py:203: [E501] line too long (80 > 79 characters)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://gpdb-dev.bosh.pivotalci.info/teams/pgadmin/pipelines/pgadmin-patch/jobs/run-linter/builds/17#L5ad0f3d8:293>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./pgadmin/tools/backup/tests/test_batch_process.py:204: [E128] continuation line under-indented for visual indent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://gpdb-dev.bosh.pivotalci.info/teams/pgadmin/pipelines/pgadmin-patch/jobs/run-linter/builds/17#L5ad0f3d8:294>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./pgadmin/tools/backup/tests/test_batch_process.py:204: [E501] line too long (94 > 79 characters)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://gpdb-dev.bosh.pivotalci.info/teams/pgadmin/pipelines/pgadmin-patch/jobs/run-linter/builds/17#L5ad0f3d8:295>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./pgadmin/tools/backup/tests/test_batch_process.py:205: [E128] continuation line under-indented for visual indent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://gpdb-dev.bosh.pivotalci.info/teams/pgadmin/pipelines/pgadmin-patch/jobs/run-linter/builds/17#L5ad0f3d8:296>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./pgadmin/tools/backup/tests/test_batch_process.py:205: [E501] line too long (94 > 79 characters)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://gpdb-dev.bosh.pivotalci.info/teams/pgadmin/pipelines/pgadmin-patch/jobs/run-linter/builds/17#L5ad0f3d8:297>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./pgadmin/tools/backup/tests/test_batch_process.py:216: [W391] blank line at end of file
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://gpdb-dev.bosh.pivotalci.info/teams/pgadmin/pipelines/pgadmin-patch/jobs/run-linter/builds/17#L5ad0f3d8:298>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./pgadmin/tools/backup/tests/test_create_backup_job.py:296: [E501] line too long (97 > 79 characters)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://gpdb-dev.bosh.pivotalci.info/teams/pgadmin/pipelines/pgadmin-patch/jobs/run-linter/builds/17#L5ad0f3d8:299>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./pgadmin/tools/backup/tests/test_create_backup_job.py:317: [E303] too many blank lines (2)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://gpdb-dev.bosh.pivotalci.info/teams/pgadmin/pipelines/pgadmin-patch/jobs/run-linter/builds/17#L5ad0f3d8:300>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./pgadmin/tools/backup/tests/test_create_backup_job.py:336: [E501] line too long (84 > 79 characters)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://gpdb-dev.bosh.pivotalci.info/teams/pgadmin/pipelines/pgadmin-patch/jobs/run-linter/builds/17#L5ad0f3d8:301>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./pgadmin/tools/backup/tests/test_create_backup_job.py:371: [W391] blank line at end of file
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://gpdb-dev.bosh.pivotalci.info/teams/pgadmin/pipelines/pgadmin-patch/jobs/run-linter/builds/17#L5ad0f3d8:302>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2 E121 continuation line under-indented for hanging indent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://gpdb-dev.bosh.pivotalci.info/teams/pgadmin/pipelines/pgadmin-patch/jobs/run-linter/builds/17#L5ad0f3d8:303>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5 E122 continuation line missing indentation or outdented
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://gpdb-dev.bosh.pivotalci.info/teams/pgadmin/pipelines/pgadmin-patch/jobs/run-linter/builds/17#L5ad0f3d8:304>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2 E128 continuation line under-indented for visual indent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://gpdb-dev.bosh.pivotalci.info/teams/pgadmin/pipelines/pgadmin-patch/jobs/run-linter/builds/17#L5ad0f3d8:305>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2 E251 unexpected spaces around keyword / parameter equals
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://gpdb-dev.bosh.pivotalci.info/teams/pgadmin/pipelines/pgadmin-patch/jobs/run-linter/builds/17#L5ad0f3d8:306>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1 E303 too many blank lines (2)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://gpdb-dev.bosh.pivotalci.info/teams/pgadmin/pipelines/pgadmin-patch/jobs/run-linter/builds/17#L5ad0f3d8:307>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 24 E501 line too long (91 > 79 characters)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://gpdb-dev.bosh.pivotalci.info/teams/pgadmin/pipelines/pgadmin-patch/jobs/run-linter/builds/17#L5ad0f3d8:308>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2 W391 blank line at end of file
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://gpdb-dev.bosh.pivotalci.info/teams/pgadmin/pipelines/pgadmin-patch/jobs/run-linter/builds/17#L5ad0f3d8:309>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 38
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For the feature tests, we realized we had to update the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> configuration, and we did that, but we get the following error attached. We
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> spent some time trying to understand the problem but we were not successful.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Codewise:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - We just found some One Letter Variables in the code...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Looks like there is a bug report in this area of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> code and we do not have coverage for it:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://redmine.postgresql.org/issues/3232
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Looks like in some of the unit tests we only have happy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> path tests, maybe we should see if there are any sad paths that also need
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> coverage.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The configuration change, maybe need to be updated. When
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we install multiple versions of postgres the binaries live in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> `/usr/lib/postgresql/{{db_version}}/bin`, which makes us
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think that this configuration should live near the server configuration,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> maybe? Also to maintain coherency on the naming maybe we should make it all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lower case.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just as an aside, you can add the gpdb configuration as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well in you patch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Victoria & Joao
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 5:20 AM Khushboo Vashi <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> khushboo(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please find the attached patch which covers test cases
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the backup module (RM #3206).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Unit test cases
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. End to end regression test cases
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Feature test cases
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Khushboo
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>

Attachment Content-Type Size
RM_3206_ver5.patch application/octet-stream 108.2 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Khushboo Vashi 2018-06-06 06:42:28 [pgAdmin4][Patch]: RM 3362 - Fix the functions for PG v11, and add support procedure for PG v11
Previous Message Khushboo Vashi 2018-06-06 04:07:51 Re: [pgadmin4][Patch]: Test cases for the backup module