From: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michal Novotny <michal(dot)novotny(at)trustport(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Mailing Lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Database schema diff |
Date: | 2015-10-13 17:23:25 |
Message-ID: | CAFNqd5XHWwmw73Kqz3iX8g9rdkPh5YczkZL2RCPG0Xe+G0JyeA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 13 October 2015 at 11:48, Michal Novotny <michal(dot)novotny(at)trustport(dot)com>
wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I would like to ask you whether is there any tool to be able to compare
> database schemas ideally no matter what the column order is or to dump
> database table with ascending order of all database columns.
>
> For example, if I have table (called table) in schema A and in schema B
> (the time difference between is 1 week) and I would like to verify the
> column names/types matches but the order is different, i.e.:
>
> Schema A (2015-10-01) | Schema B (2015-10-07)
> |
> id int | id int
> name varchar(64) | name varchar(64)
> text text | description text
> description text | text text
>
> Is there any tool to compare and (even in case above) return that both
> tables match? Something like pgdiff or something?
>
> This should work for all schemas, tables, functions, triggers and all
> the schema components?
>
> Also, is there any tool to accept 2 PgSQL dump files (source for
> pg_restore) and compare the schemas of both in the way above?
>
> Thanks a lot!
> Michal
I built a tool I call "pgcmp", which is out on GitHub <
https://github.com/cbbrowne/pgcmp>
The one thing that you mention that it *doesn't* consider is the ordering
of columns.
It would not be difficult at all to add that comparison; as simple as adding
an extra capture of table columns and column #'s. I'd be happy to consider
adding that in.
Note that pgcmp expects the database to be captured as databases; it pulls
data
from information_schema and such. In order to run it against a pair of
dumps,
you'd need to load those dumps into databases, first.
--
When confronted by a difficult problem, solve it by reducing it to the
question, "How would the Lone Ranger handle this?"
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2015-10-13 18:02:58 | Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-10-13 17:08:50 | Re: pam auth - add rhost item |