| From: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem |
| Date: | 2013-10-10 19:41:30 |
| Message-ID: | CAFNqd5XH2wXDXRHEZwrTHMSvMzke04wwTRbe-3jGa0eHrrqMbw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> How do we handle the Python dependency, or is this all to be done in
> some other language? I certainly am not ready to take on that job.
I should think it possible to reimplement it in C. It was considerably
useful to start by implementing in Python, as that evades various sorts
of efforts needed in C (e.g. - memory allocation, picking a hash table
implementation), and allows someone to hack on it without needing to
run through a recompile every time something is touched.
--
When confronted by a difficult problem, solve it by reducing it to the
question, "How would the Lone Ranger handle this?"
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Farina | 2013-10-10 19:44:09 | Re: pg_stat_statements: calls under-estimation propagation |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2013-10-10 19:39:31 | Re: dynamic shared memory: wherein I am punished for good intentions |