From: | Bert <biertie(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-sql <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | plan not correct? |
Date: | 2016-03-21 14:03:56 |
Message-ID: | CAFCtE1mVr5FcO+GvCyhMAKjtZEcuDLjpQ4oQvdRcoVerCBgtDg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-sql |
Dear all,
I am not sure if I am looking at a bug, or I am just doing something wrong.
Anyhow, to me it seems that the plan for an upsert is wrong. (I can not
find how many rows are inserted in the table)
Regard the following setup:
# select count(1) from dlp.st_itemseat;
count
-------
0
(1 row)
# select count(1) from loaddlp.st_itemseat_insert where loadtabletime =
'2016-03-21 14:53:28.771467';
count
-------
12
(1 row)
# explain analyze <upsert query>*
QUERY
PLAN
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Insert on st_itemseat (cost=26.14..41.39 rows=1 width=228) (actual
time=1.282..1.282 rows=0 loops=1)
CTE upsert
-> Update on st_itemseat et (cost=0.15..26.11 rows=1 width=240)
(actual time=0.066..0.066 rows=0 loops=1)
-> Nested Loop (cost=0.15..26.11 rows=1 width=240) (actual
time=0.061..0.061 rows=0 loops=1)
-> Seq Scan on st_itemseat_insert st_itemseat_insert_1
(cost=0.00..13.75 rows=2 width=234) (actual time=0.031..0.040 rows=12
loops=1)
Filter: (loadtabletime = '2016-03-21
14:53:28.771467'::timestamp without time zone)
Rows Removed by Filter: 75
-> Index Scan using pk_st_itemseat on st_itemseat et
(cost=0.15..6.17 rows=1 width=14) (actual time=0.001..0.001 rows=0 loops=12)
Index Cond: ((tick_server_id =
st_itemseat_insert_1.tick_server_id) AND (itemseat_id =
st_itemseat_insert_1.itemseat_id))
-> Seq Scan on st_itemseat_insert (cost=0.02..15.27 rows=1 width=228)
(actual time=0.175..0.201 rows=12 loops=1)
Filter: ((loadtabletime = '2016-03-21 14:53:28.771467'::timestamp
without time zone) AND (NOT (hashed SubPlan 2)))
Rows Removed by Filter: 75
SubPlan 2
-> CTE Scan on upsert (cost=0.00..0.02 rows=1 width=8) (actual
time=0.068..0.068 rows=0 loops=1)
Planning time: 1.022 ms
Execution time: 1.596 ms
(16 rows)
# <upsert query>*
INSERT 0 0
# select count(1) from dlp.st_itemseat;
count
-------
12
(1 row)
* the upsert query is added as an attachment to this mail.
In the query plan it seems that 0 rows are inserted; although 12 rows are
inserted when we compare the 2 counts.
When an update happens, the rows reported in the 'update' statement are
correct.
Is this a bug? Or am I looking at the wrong part of the plan? I would like
to check how many rows are actually inserted from the plan.
wkr,
Bert
--
Bert Desmet
0477/305361
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
upsert.sql | application/sql | 3.1 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vick Khera | 2016-03-21 14:15:12 | Re: grant select on pg_stat_activity |
Previous Message | Mark Morgan Lloyd | 2016-03-21 13:44:42 | PostgreSQL advocacy |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2016-03-21 14:39:25 | Re: plan not correct? |
Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2016-03-19 01:03:44 | Re: recursive WITH nested union ALL with NOCYCLE logic |