| From: | Dominique Devienne <ddevienne(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Luzanov <p(dot)luzanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Lok P <loknath(dot)73(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Users and object privileges maintenance |
| Date: | 2024-02-18 18:35:00 |
| Message-ID: | CAFCRh-_qYCD4Ex1KfL5Vmer_cwvqvagzKo0Xn2L2_iU3domWqQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 4:33 PM Pavel Luzanov <p(dot)luzanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
wrote:
> On 18.02.2024 17:40, Dominique Devienne wrote:
>
> Well, membership in a role mean you can "become that role", no? Thus this
> seems logical,
> and not confusing to me, that you can act as the owner, since you SET ROLE
> to the owner.
>
> They may acts as the owner even without explicit SET ROLE to the owner.
> It wasn't obvious to me when I came to postgres from oracle.
>
> Well, that depends on INHERIT on the ROLE, and since v16 on the membership
GRANT, probably.
But that's a good point, worth mentioning indeed. As I wrote, understanding
INHERIT is important. --DD
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2024-02-18 18:40:23 | Re: Function inserting into tstzrange ? (syntax error at or near...) |
| Previous Message | Laura Smith | 2024-02-18 18:30:20 | Re: Function inserting into tstzrange ? (syntax error at or near...) |