| From: | Dominique Devienne <ddevienne(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Switching to NOINHERIT user triggers #XX000 error |
| Date: | 2024-11-05 18:29:04 |
| Message-ID: | CAFCRh-_du9nVxpFVc9WV62TsMK=7+NTWnCG3K8QLmOrQ4Xs0WQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 7:25 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Dominique Devienne <ddevienne(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 6:42 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> This is probably a bug, at least to the extent that we don't like
> >> XX000 errors to be easily reachable, so please let us know what
> >> you find out.
>
> > Finding where the error is thrown is easy, it's when I'm doing that grant.
> > But the code creates two larguish schemas before that and several ROLEs,
> > so it's not easy to share.
>
> Really, we need a self-contained example case to do anything
> about this. Maybe you could anonymize the object names in
> your test?
I understand, thanks. I might be able to do that. We'll see. --DD
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Matt Zagrabelny | 2024-11-05 21:45:15 | adsrc |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2024-11-05 18:25:21 | Re: Switching to NOINHERIT user triggers #XX000 error |