| From: | Dominique Devienne <ddevienne(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Why no pg_has_role(..., 'ADMIN')? |
| Date: | 2024-09-23 12:56:33 |
| Message-ID: | CAFCRh-9JFk3eUnGxx6dUjejKEN-LSb9RKSckz0ifUUtpQu+5rA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 8:49 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 2:34 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > I'm now inclined to add wording within the pg_has_role entry
> I don't have an opinion about the details, but +1 for documenting it
+1 as well. Especially since I now recall, in hindsight,
about reading the *distant* mention about 'WITH ADMIN OPTION'
that could be added, but still forgot about it when reading only the
*immediate* doc on pg_has_role(). My $0.02. --DD
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dominique Devienne | 2024-09-23 12:59:43 | Re: Customize psql prompt to show current_role |
| Previous Message | Dominique Devienne | 2024-09-23 12:54:03 | Re: Why no pg_has_role(..., 'ADMIN')? |