Re: Moving to Postgresql database

From: Dominique Devienne <ddevienne(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
Cc: veem v <veema0000(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Moving to Postgresql database
Date: 2024-01-16 17:04:43
Message-ID: CAFCRh-9Es2Ahgzetyu-46guwyGwPjaJXHfGpF0AG4zt7KDBjfw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 5:07 PM Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
wrote:

> On 1/16/24 00:06, Dominique Devienne wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 5:17 AM veem v <veema0000(at)gmail(dot)com
> > <mailto:veema0000(at)gmail(dot)com>> wrote:
> > Is any key design/architectural changes should the app development
> > team [...], should really aware about
> > Hi. One of the biggest pitfall of PostgreSQL, from the app-dev
> perspective,
> > is the fact any failed statement fails the whole transaction, with
> > ROLLBACK as the only recourse.
>
> "SAVEPOINT establishes a new savepoint within the current transaction.
>

I wish it was that easy.
I've been scared away from using them, after reading a few articles...
Also, that incurs extra round trips to the server, from the extra commands.

I really wish https://github.com/lzlabs/pg_statement_rollback was built-in.
Don't make it the default, for backward compatibility, but please let me
opt-in to it, w/o an extension.

https://buttondown.email/nelhage/archive/notes-on-some-postgresql-implementation-details/
https://postgres.ai/blog/20210831-postgresql-subtransactions-considered-harmful
https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2021/09/29/why-we-spent-the-last-month-eliminating-postgresql-subtransactions/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2024-01-16 17:10:01 Re: Moving to Postgresql database
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2024-01-16 17:04:05 Re: Postgres Database Service Interruption