From: | Dominique Devienne <ddevienne(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: #XX000: ERROR: tuple concurrently updated |
Date: | 2025-02-24 09:21:50 |
Message-ID: | CAFCRh-957e6i9NWXo9iNCS10AGKjSRqZ_CoCP+-67s82Rd8Bjw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 4:27 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Dominique Devienne <ddevienne(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > Error: DDL Error: GRANT USAGE ON SCHEMA "SCH1", "SCH2" TO "SCH2:RO",
> > "SCH2:RW", "SCH2:SU": #XX000: ERROR: tuple concurrently updated
>
> Since both restores tried to grant some permissions on SCH1, they
> both had to update SCH1's pg_namespace row (specifically nspacl).
> We have no support for concurrent updates in the catalog-manipulation
> code, so if the second run arrives at that step before the first
> one has committed its pg_namespace change, you get this error.
>
Hi Tom, and al.
I have a related question, on role-to-role grants this time.
Above, it was contention on pg_namespace.nspacl in two transactions.
But during those "restore" transactions, I must also make role-to-role
grants,
which AFAIK involve adding rows to pg_auth_members. So they are not subject
to the same "no support for concurrent updates in the catalog-manipulation"
you mentioned, as schema-to-role grants are, right? Because that's an
insert,
not an update? Just want to make sure, as I'm thinking how to change our
code.
Thanks, --DD
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dominique Devienne | 2025-02-24 09:46:17 | Keep specialized query pairs, or use single more general but more complex one |
Previous Message | richard | 2025-02-24 09:16:20 | Re: In-place upgrade with streaming replicas |