Re: Keep specialized query pairs, or use single more general but more complex one

From: Dominique Devienne <ddevienne(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Rob Sargent <robjsargent(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk
Subject: Re: Keep specialized query pairs, or use single more general but more complex one
Date: 2025-02-24 15:27:12
Message-ID: CAFCRh-87cx1SYPt+S7xP+trz=yX77HECGokYOije-MLK0u+chQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 3:51 PM Rob Sargent <robjsargent(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> API:
> > * The first type never relies on fuzzy-find.
>
> Then have that app type use the simple, fast query.
>

I'm sorry, but that's neither helpful, nor relevant. --DD

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2025-02-24 16:00:02 Re: Default Value Retention After Dropping Default
Previous Message Laurenz Albe 2025-02-24 15:10:06 Re: COLLATION update in 13.1