| From: | Dominique Devienne <ddevienne(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Rob Sargent <robjsargent(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: why generated columsn cannot be used in COPY TO? |
| Date: | 2023-10-06 15:06:43 |
| Message-ID: | CAFCRh-86krUaoSJdnR0Gf5mDuXq=pAGkv1vdXHAoxpPHd5hFaQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 4:59 PM Rob Sargent <robjsargent(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> What would be copied? The formula?
Of course not. That's DDL, not DML IMHO.
> Seems to me one is using “the fast option” so adding the column which can
> be regenerated is overhead.
>
Regenerated by whom? COPY TO to is output to the outside world.
Nothing says it will come back to PostgreSQL later. COPY is not only for
backups.
I use COPY to "stream" rows out for processing, combines the best of SELECT
and the incremental nature of CURSOR, for the best latency and throughput.
All that said, that's a work-around like Andreas showed.
I agree with Tom that ignoring them in the default list makes sense,
but that if explicitly asked for, they should be copied out. My $0.02.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ron | 2023-10-06 15:45:58 | Re: why generated columsn cannot be used in COPY TO? |
| Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2023-10-06 15:03:48 | Re: why generated columsn cannot be used in COPY TO? |