Re: fix typos

From: John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: fix typos
Date: 2022-08-05 04:47:23
Message-ID: CAFBsxsHvUEtG1QAfy0Vs-gvitnOJUuTzNSdzcyOHija5QGW-7g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 8:41 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:

> > RepOriginId is a typedef for uint16, so this can't print the wrong
answer,
> > but it is inconsistent with other uses. So it seems we don't need to
> > backpatch this one?
>
> Um ... if it's int16, then it can't be an OID, so I'd say this message has
> far worse problems than %d vs %u. It should not use that terminology.

The catalog has the following. Since it's not a real oid, maybe this column
should be rethought?

CATALOG(pg_replication_origin,6000,ReplicationOriginRelationId)
BKI_SHARED_RELATION
{
/*
* Locally known id that get included into WAL.
*
* This should never leave the system.
*
* Needs to fit into an uint16, so we don't waste too much space in WAL
* records. For this reason we don't use a normal Oid column here, since
* we need to handle allocation of new values manually.
*/
Oid roident;
[...]

--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dilip Kumar 2022-08-05 04:52:35 Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2022-08-05 04:10:02 Re: Handle infinite recursion in logical replication setup