Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum

From: John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yura Sokolov <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Date: 2023-02-10 06:51:24
Message-ID: CAFBsxsHrb_PYrM_Ah+vW5a15h=EJK1JUnxEqgFdNOYAMPh5FdQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 2:08 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
>
> query: select * from bench_tidstore_load(0, 10 * 1000 * 1000)
>
> v15:
> load_ms
> ---------
> 816

How did you build the tid store and test on v15? I first tried to
apply v15-0009-PoC-lazy-vacuum-integration.patch, which conflicts with
vacuum now, so reset all that, but still getting build errors because the
tid store types and functions have changed.

--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Smith 2023-02-10 07:10:53 Re: Exit walsender before confirming remote flush in logical replication
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2023-02-10 06:42:31 Re: ICU locale validation / canonicalization