Re: SQL/JSON revisited

From: John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Elena Indrupskaya <e(dot)indrupskaya(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru
Subject: Re: SQL/JSON revisited
Date: 2023-01-11 07:18:21
Message-ID: CAFBsxsHr5RTtzBXrcrS_FjLTn5KyY4OFhihhqG+3F5MW2gcyRg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 2:02 PM Elena Indrupskaya <
e(dot)indrupskaya(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
>
> Sorry for upsetting your bot. :(

What I do in these cases is save the incremental patch as a .txt file --
that way people can read it, but the cf bot doesn't try to launch a CI run.
And if I forget that detail, well it's not a big deal, it happens sometimes.

--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bharath Rupireddy 2023-01-11 07:32:13 Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys
Previous Message John Naylor 2023-01-11 07:09:56 Re: cutting down the TODO list thread