Re: Consistently use "startup process"/"WAL sender" instead of "Startup process"/"WAL Sender" in comments and docs.

From: John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Consistently use "startup process"/"WAL sender" instead of "Startup process"/"WAL Sender" in comments and docs.
Date: 2022-02-13 12:19:28
Message-ID: CAFBsxsGWxGZTa62N=hr2U+T3P6yYEUsbdpy-q0NYJSzpdKb4bw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 3:13 PM Bharath Rupireddy
<bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In the code comments, it is being used as "Startup process" in the
> middle of the sentences whereas in most of the places "startup
> process" is used. Also, "WAL Sender" is being used instead of "WAL
> sender". Let's be consistent across the docs and code comments.

FWIW, docs need to hold to a higher standard than code comments.

--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2022-02-13 12:27:08 Re: FailedAssertion("prev_first_lsn < cur_txn->first_lsn", File: "reorderbuffer.c", Line: 1173, ...
Previous Message John Naylor 2022-02-13 12:14:07 Re: Non-decimal integer literals