Re: BUG #17128: minimum numeric 'integer' is -2147483647 not -2147483648 as documented

From: John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: kjs(at)teews(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #17128: minimum numeric 'integer' is -2147483647 not -2147483648 as documented
Date: 2021-07-30 20:44:48
Message-ID: CAFBsxsGMohyrt=76DnqtKNy6gYnra2qB+Kct1oOkUz6EX5AgZA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 3:22 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> > Here's a draft fix for master, with regression tests.
>
> Passes an eyeball check, though I didn't run the test.

Pushed, thanks for looking! I'll keep an eye on the build farm.

--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2021-07-31 01:40:50 Re: BUG #17061: Impossible to query the fields of the tuple created by SEARCH BREADTH FIRST BY .. SET ..
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-07-30 19:22:07 Re: BUG #17128: minimum numeric 'integer' is -2147483647 not -2147483648 as documented