Re: mark the timestamptz variant of date_bin() as stable

From: John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: mark the timestamptz variant of date_bin() as stable
Date: 2021-09-23 16:16:47
Message-ID: CAFBsxsG541rVfPM=zzokOUzJ1jc1szZaUjKYiK0gUbg1AmGzmg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:

> I think you have a point that it could be stated more simply and
generally. I'll try to move in that direction.

On second thought, I don't think this is helpful. Concrete examples are
easier to reason about.

--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2021-09-23 16:39:55 Re: prevent immature WAL streaming
Previous Message Robert Haas 2021-09-23 16:14:03 Re: when the startup process doesn't (logging startup delays)