From: | John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)iki(dot)fi> |
Subject: | Re: logical decoding and replication of sequences, take 2 |
Date: | 2023-03-17 05:54:30 |
Message-ID: | CAFBsxsFhjgsE95nmWTu13X5QZC0kfpgrxeKuq9Ucne1uv4y_Ug@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 7:00 PM Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
wrote:
>
> On 3/10/23 11:03, John Naylor wrote:
> > + * When we're called via the SQL SRF there's already a transaction
> >
> > I see this was copied from existing code, but I found it confusing --
> > does this function have a stable name?
>
> What do you mean by "stable name"? It certainly is not exposed as a
> user-callable SQL function, so I think this comment it misleading and
> should be removed.
Okay, I was just trying to think of why it was phrased this way...
--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2023-03-17 06:07:04 | Re: Add macros for ReorderBufferTXN toptxn |
Previous Message | John Naylor | 2023-03-17 05:53:46 | Re: logical decoding and replication of sequences, take 2 |