Re: [PATCH] Clarify the behavior of the system when approaching XID wraparound

From: John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Clarify the behavior of the system when approaching XID wraparound
Date: 2023-05-13 04:13:50
Message-ID: CAFBsxsF3yoSpv_ui+mUK47xtFmYXYge3MJQn1V3vFum7hNNsSw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attached is v9, which is mostly editing the steps for restoring normal
operation, which are in 0003 now but will be squashed into 0002. Comments
to polish the wording welcome.

--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
v9-0003-Rough-draft-of-complete-steps-to-recover-from-M-X.patch text/x-patch 3.8 KB
v9-0001-Correct-outdated-docs-and-messages-regarding-XID-.patch text/x-patch 8.6 KB
v9-0002-Stop-telling-users-to-run-VACUUM-in-a-single-user.patch text/x-patch 6.5 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Naylor 2023-05-13 04:41:45 Re: cutting down the TODO list thread
Previous Message Xiaoran Wang 2023-05-13 04:03:53 Re: [PATCH] Use RelationClose rather than table_close in heap_create_with_catalog