Re: mark the timestamptz variant of date_bin() as stable

From: John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: mark the timestamptz variant of date_bin() as stable
Date: 2021-08-31 19:22:57
Message-ID: CAFBsxsEu2gC_iQWKvm_gErZk6uOEGAcuryiFrQq2R0Vmjp8Sow@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 3:07 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> > (Starting a new thread for greater visibility)
> > The attached is a fairly straightforward correction. I did want to make
> > sure it was okay to bump the catversion in the PG14 branch also. I've
seen
> > fixes where doing that during beta was in question.
>
> Yeah, you need to bump catversion.

Done, thanks for confirming.

--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2021-08-31 19:34:42 Re: CFM for september commitfest
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-08-31 19:07:09 Re: mark the timestamptz variant of date_bin() as stable