Re: [PATCH] Add loongarch native checksum implementation.

From: John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: YANG Xudong <yangxudong(at)ymatrix(dot)cn>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, wengyanqing(at)ymatrix(dot)cn, wanghao(at)ymatrix(dot)cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add loongarch native checksum implementation.
Date: 2023-07-26 07:38:54
Message-ID: CAFBsxsEn7b-4AxUp2Ws7Kdqig5VwdbtAGDcVW_B76NX5ttbmmg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 8:25 AM YANG Xudong <yangxudong(at)ymatrix(dot)cn> wrote:
>
> Many thanks to huchangqi. Now we have loongarch64 support for both old
> world ABI and new world ABI on the buildfarm!

Glad to hear it!

On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 10:16 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
wrote:
>
> The performance numbers presented upthread for the CRC computations
> are kind of nice in this environment, but honestly I have no idea how
> much this architecture is used. Perhaps that's only something in
> China? I am not seeing much activity around that in Japan, for
> instance, and that's really close.

That was my impression as well. My thinking was, we can give the same
treatment that we gave Arm a number of years ago (which is now quite
mainstream).

> Anyway, based on today's state of the buildfarm, we have a buildfarm
> member named cisticola that should be able to test this new CRC
> implementation, so I see no problem in applying this stuff now if you
> think it is in good shape.

I believe there was just a comment that needed updating, so I'll do that
and push within a few days.

--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2023-07-26 08:09:45 pgsql: Some refactoring to export json(b) conversion functions
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2023-07-26 07:27:27 Re: logical decoding and replication of sequences, take 2