From: | John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | YANG Xudong <yangxudong(at)ymatrix(dot)cn>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, wengyanqing(at)ymatrix(dot)cn, wanghao(at)ymatrix(dot)cn |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Add loongarch native checksum implementation. |
Date: | 2023-07-26 07:38:54 |
Message-ID: | CAFBsxsEn7b-4AxUp2Ws7Kdqig5VwdbtAGDcVW_B76NX5ttbmmg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 8:25 AM YANG Xudong <yangxudong(at)ymatrix(dot)cn> wrote:
>
> Many thanks to huchangqi. Now we have loongarch64 support for both old
> world ABI and new world ABI on the buildfarm!
Glad to hear it!
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 10:16 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
wrote:
>
> The performance numbers presented upthread for the CRC computations
> are kind of nice in this environment, but honestly I have no idea how
> much this architecture is used. Perhaps that's only something in
> China? I am not seeing much activity around that in Japan, for
> instance, and that's really close.
That was my impression as well. My thinking was, we can give the same
treatment that we gave Arm a number of years ago (which is now quite
mainstream).
> Anyway, based on today's state of the buildfarm, we have a buildfarm
> member named cisticola that should be able to test this new CRC
> implementation, so I see no problem in applying this stuff now if you
> think it is in good shape.
I believe there was just a comment that needed updating, so I'll do that
and push within a few days.
--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Langote | 2023-07-26 08:09:45 | pgsql: Some refactoring to export json(b) conversion functions |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2023-07-26 07:27:27 | Re: logical decoding and replication of sequences, take 2 |