| From: | John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF? |
| Date: | 2020-11-20 15:56:15 |
| Message-ID: | CAFBsxsEZiSn1wCUdLYn-tUeWX3K5Ca=Au-AfCghijm5ghOfMDQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 6:43 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> After digging a bit more I noticed that we'd discussed removing
> IS OF in the 2007 thread, but forebore because there wasn't an easy
> replacement. pg_typeof() was added a year later (b8fab2411), so we
> could have done this at any point since then.
>
> Pushed.
>
Documenting or improving IS OF was a TODO, so I've removed that entry.
--
John Naylor
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2020-11-20 15:56:38 | Re: jit and explain nontext |
| Previous Message | Sergei Kornilov | 2020-11-20 15:47:59 | Re: Improve handling of parameter differences in physical replication |