From: | Vasilis Ventirozos <v(dot)ventirozos(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Wells Oliver *EXTERN*" <wellsoliver(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: WAL log management w/ multiple slaves |
Date: | 2014-12-03 10:06:52 |
Message-ID: | CAF8jcqo3dbBzE6iA_SjxQ2WH2kkHiCKq-qfzWNsSLVcdHzXg8A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>
wrote:
> Wells Oliver wrote:
> > Hi all. I currently have one master and one slave, and the slave cleans
> up the unneeded WAL files via
> > pg_archivecleanup.
> >
> > I'm adding a third slave and I was wondering what the best practices are
> in terms of managing these
> > WAL files when there's more than one dependent server, in a situation
> where you can't have a slave
> > removing the files.
> >
> > I thought I could just cron up a removal of logs older than X days,
> which seems pretty easy, but not
> > sure.
>
> cron would work fine.
>
> My scripts clean up old archived WAL as part of the backup job - that way
> I can be sure
> that no archives are deleted unless they have been backed up first.
>
> Yours,
> Laurenz Albe
>
check out OmniPITR it rocks when it comes to wal management
https://github.com/omniti-labs/omnipitr
Regards,
Vasilis Ventirozos
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Raj Gandhi | 2014-12-03 20:07:12 | Postgres log configuration for locking |
Previous Message | Albe Laurenz | 2014-12-03 08:30:14 | Re: WAL log management w/ multiple slaves |