Re: a modest improvement to get_object_address()

From: Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: a modest improvement to get_object_address()
Date: 2011-11-09 15:50:22
Message-ID: CAF6yO=1diMT8qrbWq1pT3_QX+dOgnh-rc2CpJ+c5rbO4ctMhKQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2011/11/9 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 8:37 AM, Cédric Villemain
> <cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Maybe I miss something but:

I read that the error was produced by first session and didn't check
carefuly (it fails silently in 9.0! and 'works' as expected in 9.1)

No objection, but I would like to still be able to diagnose the same
things as in the past, can you make it clear that the schema/object
just disappear ? (else we don't know if the relation just never exists
or was drop while we were waiting)

--
Cédric Villemain +33 (0)6 20 30 22 52
http://2ndQuadrant.fr/
PostgreSQL: Support 24x7 - Développement, Expertise et Formation

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-11-09 15:57:08 Re: const correctness
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-11-09 15:49:04 Re: const correctness