From: | Debraj Manna <subharaj(dot)manna(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Status of the patch "Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics" |
Date: | 2017-11-24 05:53:16 |
Message-ID: | CAF6DVKO5iAvHZBspg+UW3PuY92NNid91x01Bpo5ZTqTdOfzmDA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Thanks Andres.
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 3:18 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2017-11-24 00:15:44 +0530, Debraj Manna wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Can someone let me know if the patches discussed in the below blog
> >
> > http://akorotkov.github.io/blog/2016/05/09/scalability-
> towards-millions-tps/
> >
> > especially the below one has made it to postgres 10 or not? I am not able
> > to figure out the status of the patch?
>
> It has been applied not just to postgres 10, but also postgres 9.6. See
> this note in the release notes:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/release-9-6.html
> Replace shared-buffer header spinlocks with atomic operations to improve
> scalability (Alexander Korotkov, Andres Freund)
>
> Greetings,
>
> Andres Freund
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Debraj Manna | 2017-11-25 03:34:46 | Faster way of upgrading postgresql to 10 from 9.5 |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2017-11-23 21:48:10 | Re: Status of the patch "Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics" |