Re: Status of the patch "Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics"

From: Debraj Manna <subharaj(dot)manna(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Status of the patch "Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics"
Date: 2017-11-24 05:53:16
Message-ID: CAF6DVKO5iAvHZBspg+UW3PuY92NNid91x01Bpo5ZTqTdOfzmDA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Thanks Andres.

On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 3:18 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On 2017-11-24 00:15:44 +0530, Debraj Manna wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Can someone let me know if the patches discussed in the below blog
> >
> > http://akorotkov.github.io/blog/2016/05/09/scalability-
> towards-millions-tps/
> >
> > especially the below one has made it to postgres 10 or not? I am not able
> > to figure out the status of the patch?
>
> It has been applied not just to postgres 10, but also postgres 9.6. See
> this note in the release notes:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/release-9-6.html
> Replace shared-buffer header spinlocks with atomic operations to improve
> scalability (Alexander Korotkov, Andres Freund)
>
> Greetings,
>
> Andres Freund
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Debraj Manna 2017-11-25 03:34:46 Faster way of upgrading postgresql to 10 from 9.5
Previous Message Andres Freund 2017-11-23 21:48:10 Re: Status of the patch "Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics"