| From: | Pól Ua Laoínecháin <linehanp(at)tcd(dot)ie> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Is my lecturer wrong about PostgreSQL? I think he is! |
| Date: | 2019-10-09 22:22:35 |
| Message-ID: | CAF4RT5Smv0QJ_eeqQZx+0jVQn8D_qA9MYje5Nc3+xrCM5tFppA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi, and thanks for responding,
> First off- please try to craft a new email in the future...
My apologies to you and the group - I'll do that in future.
> > 1) Is my lecturer full of it or does he really have a point?
> He's full of it, as far as I can tell anyway, based on what you've
> shared with us. Just look at the committers and the commit history to
> PostgreSQL, and look at who the largest contributors are and who they
> work for. That alone might be enough to surprise your lecturer with.
The only non-PostgreSQL company that I could find was Fujitisu - where
can I find a (list of) the others?
> Databases that do direct I/O don't depend on fsync. That said, I do
> think this could have been an issue for Oracle if you ran it without
> direct i/o.
I think that Oracle are big into asyncio? I know that you have to sudo
dnf install some_library with a name like asio/asyncio or something
like that?
Anyway, why doesn't PostgreSQL use Direct I/O?
Thanks again and rgs,
Pól...
> Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-10-09 22:31:17 | Re: plpgsql copy import csv double quotes |
| Previous Message | Miles Elam | 2019-10-09 22:20:11 | Re: Event Triggers and GRANT/REVOKE |