Re: Updated RUM?

From: Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas(at)visena(dot)com>
Cc: Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Updated RUM?
Date: 2016-06-27 11:20:03
Message-ID: CAF4Au4zqtupVMUFoTmE_VbMfEUGRfYfww_5bPvBKQkadUvEBHA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 2:36 PM, Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas(at)visena(dot)com>
wrote:

> Hi.
>
> @PostgresPro; Will there be any updates to the rum git-repo any time soon?
>

Sure.

>
> I understand you're working hard on this, care to share some
> vision/roadmap? I'm specifically interested in if RUM will support the same
> datatypes as GIN supports (arrays, JSON etc.), and what opclasses you plan
> to implement (for equalty and sorting). Will there be some kind of
> btree_rum like there is for btree_gin, to add RUM-support for the types
> there exists Btree-support for?
>

We are testing fts+timestamp combination right now. The challenge is to
have posting list/tree sorted by addinfo (timestamp) not by item pointer.
It works already, but we are not quite satisfied with generated WAL traffic
and are researching some options in improving posting tree building and
generic wal.

We have in mind some sort of generalization like anyarray, but don't have
any real ideas.

>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> *Andreas Joseph Krogh*
> CTO / Partner - Visena AS
> Mobile: +47 909 56 963
> andreas(at)visena(dot)com
> www.visena.com
> <https://www.visena.com>
>

In response to

  • Updated RUM? at 2016-06-24 11:36:09 from Andreas Joseph Krogh

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Joseph Krogh 2016-06-27 11:36:52 Re: Updated RUM?
Previous Message Attila Kiss 2016-06-27 10:58:35 Re: dblink authentication failed