| From: | Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas(at)visena(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Incorrect information about GIN-index in RUM's docs |
| Date: | 2016-11-15 07:48:37 |
| Message-ID: | CAF4Au4zJKKmxYrta5hfN8qFJRSYE1tvRCottPkNYV2+UY7T70Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas(at)visena(dot)com>
wrote:
> This item isn't valid, is it?
>
>
> - There isn't phrase search with GIN index. This problem relates with
> previous problem. It is need position information to perform phrase search.
>
> RUM being an extention, and having index-access-methods as extentions is
> new in 9.6, where phrase-search was introduced, this isn't really true, or
> am I missing something?
>
RUM is very good for phrase search, since it has access to coordinates in
index, check slides from PGconf.eu (
http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/postgres/talks/pgconfeu-fts-2016.pdf). Where
did you find the citation ?
>
> --
> *Andreas Joseph Krogh*
> CTO / Partner - Visena AS
> Mobile: +47 909 56 963
> andreas(at)visena(dot)com
> www.visena.com
> <https://www.visena.com>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John R Pierce | 2016-11-15 08:02:13 | Re: How the Planner in PGStrom differs from PostgreSQL? |
| Previous Message | Andreas Joseph Krogh | 2016-11-15 07:37:08 | Incorrect information about GIN-index in RUM's docs |