From: | Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas(at)visena(dot)com> |
Cc: | Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Question about RUM-index |
Date: | 2016-06-17 13:47:08 |
Message-ID: | CAF4Au4zGhL_a2jq5izg3yw=1sjE0b7FSbbyFG4Ldf2-BoNQA_A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas(at)visena(dot)com>
wrote:
> På fredag 17. juni 2016 kl. 13:53:34, skrev Oleg Bartunov <
> obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas(at)visena(dot)com
>> > wrote:
>>>
>>> På torsdag 16. juni 2016 kl. 00:50:45, skrev Jeff Janes <
>>> jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 3:56 AM, Andreas Joseph Krogh <
>>> andreas(at)visena(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi.
>>>>
>>>> First; Is this the correct forum to ask questions about the Postgres
>>>> Pro's new RUM-index?
>>>>
>>>> If not, please point me to the right forum.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I think that https://github.com/postgrespro/rum/issues might be the
>>> best forum.
>>>
>>>
>>> Oleg and friends; Should we use GitHub-issues as forum (one issue per
>>> question/thread?), pgsql-general or something else?
>>>
>>
>> Andreas,
>>
>> we are hardly working on our internal version of rum and will open it
>> after resolving some issues. I think the best place to discuss it is
>> -hackers.
>>
>
> Ah, as someone corrected me, we are working hard !
>
>
> He he, I figured that was what you meant:-)
>
> Ok, so basically - will RUM-index support the same indexing-properties as
> GIN (being able to index tsvector, BIGINT-arrays, JSONB etc.) *and* be
> able to use index for sorting on ie. timestamp, tsrank or some
> BIGINT-column?
>
> Like my example, will it be possible to issue a query like this:
>
>
> SELECT del.id
> , del.sent
> FROM delivery del
> WHERE 1 = 1 AND del.fts_all @@ to_tsquery('simple', 'hi:*')
> AND del.folder_id = ANY(ARRAY[2,3]::BIGINT[]) ORDER BY del.sent DESC LIMIT 101 OFFSET 0;
>
>
> and have it use *one* RUM-index so the whole operation, including
> sorting, is as efficient as possible?
>
>
we have implementation for timestamp. One need to write opclass to deal
with arrays, it shouldn't be difficult.
> Thanks.
>
> --
> *Andreas Joseph Krogh*
> CTO / Partner - Visena AS
> Mobile: +47 909 56 963
> andreas(at)visena(dot)com
> www.visena.com
> <https://www.visena.com>
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2016-06-17 13:48:16 | Re: ***SPAM*** Re: random huge delay when recreate a VIEW or FUNCTION |
Previous Message | Tobia Conforto | 2016-06-17 13:46:23 | Creating or modifying a tsquery from PL/pgSQL |