Re: eXtensible Transaction Manager API (v2)

On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 7:11 PM, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:

> On 2/10/16 12:50 PM, Konstantin Knizhnik wrote:
>
> > PostgresProffesional cluster teams wants to propose new version of
> > eXtensible Transaction Manager API.
> > Previous discussion concerning this patch can be found here:
> >
> >
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/F2766B97-555D-424F-B29F-E0CA0F6D1D74@postgrespro.ru
>
> I see a lot of discussion on this thread but little in the way of
> consensus.
>
> > The API patch itself is small enough, but we think that it will be
> > strange to provide just API without examples of its usage.
>
> It's not all that small, though it does apply cleanly even after a few
> months. At least that indicates there is not a lot of churn in this area.
>
> I'm concerned about the lack of response or reviewers for this patch.
> It may be because everyone believes they had their say on the original
> thread, or because it seems like a big change to go into the last CF, or
> for other reasons altogether.
>

We'll prepare easy setup to play with our solutions, so any developers
could see how it works. Hope this weekend we'll post something about this.

>
> I think you should try to make it clear why this patch would be a win
> for 9.6.
>

Looks like discussion shifted to different thread, we'll answer here.

>
> Is anyone willing to volunteer a review or make an argument for the
> importance of this patch?
>
> --
> -David
> david(at)pgmasters(dot)net
>
>