| From: | Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Draft release notes for next week's releases |
| Date: | 2016-03-29 08:56:16 |
| Message-ID: | CAF4Au4ygHiozkg61Bk-SVAZnkLszbFaBQzyX0jEEwXBP+jw58Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> Oleg Bartunov-2 wrote
> > But still, icu provides us abbreviated keys and collation stability,
>
> Does include ICU mean that collation handling is identical across
> platforms?
> E.g. a query on Linux involving string comparison would yield the same
> result on MacOS and Windows?
>
Yes, it does and that's the most important issue for us.
>
> If that is the case I'm all for it.
>
> Currently the different behaviour in handling collation aware string
> comparisons is a bug in my eyes from a user's perspective. I do understand
> and can accept the technical reasons for that, but it still feels odd that
> a
> query yields different results (with identical data) just because it runs
> on
> a different platform.
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://postgresql.nabble.com/Draft-release-notes-for-next-week-s-releases-tp5895357p5895484.html
> Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2016-03-29 09:00:50 | Re: Draft release notes for next week's releases |
| Previous Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2016-03-29 08:54:24 | Re: Dealing with collation and strcoll/strxfrm/etc |