Re: Slides for PGCon2016; "FTS is dead ? Long live FTS !"

From: Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Stefan Keller <sfkeller(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas(at)visena(dot)com>, Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Slides for PGCon2016; "FTS is dead ? Long live FTS !"
Date: 2016-05-29 17:54:58
Message-ID: CAF4Au4yXMgQjCXxLERb-R2nYBEAO5JRgRV9Tpsv4bMCJq22iWw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Stefan Keller <sfkeller(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Nice work from you postgrespro.ru guys! Especially the RUM index which
> demonstrates the power of 9.6 to let third party SW create access methods
> as extension: https://github.com/postgrespro/rum
>
> 1. I don't understand the benchmarks on slide 25 "20 mln descriptions"
> (and the one before "6.7 mln classifieds"): What does "Queries in 8 h 9.2
> +patch (9.6 rum)" mean?
>

We run queries for 8 hours and recorded the number of executed queries.
Four years ago, when I and Alexander developed an initial version of patch
we got results marked by "9.2+patch", and now we run the same queries on
the same database and put rum results into (). I'd not consider to this
numbers, since we used queries from 6 mln database. We'd be happy if
somebody run independent benchmarks.

>
> 2. What does R-U-M mean? (can't mean "Range Usage Metadata" which was
> finally coined range index BRIN)?
>

We chose RUM just because there are GIN and VODKA :) But some people
already suggested several meanings like Really Useful iMdex :) We are open
for suggestion.

>
> :Stefan, co-organizer of Swiss PGDay
>
>
> 2016-05-29 11:29 GMT+02:00 Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas(at)visena(dot)com>:
>
>> På lørdag 28. mai 2016 kl. 23:59:55, skrev Oleg Bartunov <
>> obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 11:26 PM, Andreas Joseph Krogh <
>> andreas(at)visena(dot)com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> Any news about when slides for $subject will be available?
>>>
>>
>> I submitted slides to pgcon site, but it usually takes awhile, so you can
>> download our presentation directly
>> http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/postgres/talks/pgcon-2016-fts.pdf
>>
>> There are some missing features in rum index, but I hope we'll update
>> github repository really soon.
>>
>>
>> This is simply amazing!
>>
>> I want to run 9.6 beta in production right now because of this:-)
>>
>> Hats off guys, congrats to PostgresPro, and huge thanks!!
>>
>> --
>> *Andreas Joseph Krogh*
>> CTO / Partner - Visena AS
>> Mobile: +47 909 56 963
>> andreas(at)visena(dot)com
>> www.visena.com
>> <https://www.visena.com>
>>
>>
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martín Marqués 2016-05-29 18:20:21 Re: BDR to ignore table exists error
Previous Message Andreas Joseph Krogh 2016-05-29 17:53:35 Re: Slides for PGCon2016; "FTS is dead ? Long live FTS !"