Re: JSONB performance enhancement for 9.6

From: Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Smith <tomsmith1989sk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Arthur Silva <arthurprs(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: JSONB performance enhancement for 9.6
Date: 2016-01-20 08:32:36
Message-ID: CAF4Au4yDDyXO0Hg-ZPN29E4sPOnHLSHFaSL-cT2tYF1xa=F67A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 4:51 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 09:01:03PM -0500, Tom Smith wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Congrats on the official release of 9.5
> >
> > And I'd like bring up the issue again about if 9.6 would address the
> jsonb
> > performance issue
> > with large number of top level keys.
> > It is true that it does not have to use JSON format. it is about
> serialization
> > and fast retrieval
> > of dynamic tree structure objects. (at top level, it might be called
> dynamic
> > columns)
> > So if postgresql can have its own way, that would work out too as long
> as it
> > can have intuitive query
> > (like what are implemented for json and jsonb) and fast retrieval of a
> tree
> > like object,
> > it can be called no-sql data type. After all, most motivations of using
> no-sql
> > dbs like MongoDB
> > is about working with dynamic tree object.
> >
> > If postgresql can have high performance on this, then many no-sql dbs
> would
> > become history.
>
> I can give you some backstory on this. TOAST was designed in 2001 as a
> way to store, in a data-type-agnostic way, long strings compressed and
> any other long data type, e.g. long arrays.
>
> In all previous cases, _part_ of the value wasn't useful. JSONB is a
> unique case because it is one of the few types that can be processed
> without reading the entire value, e.g. it has an index.
>
> We are going to be hesitant to do something data-type-specific for
> JSONB. It would be good if we could develop a data-type-agnostic
> approach to has TOAST can be improved. I know of no such work for 9.6,
> and it is unlikely it will be done in time for 9.6.
>

I'm looking on this time to time.

>
> --
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
> EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
>
> + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
> + Roman grave inscription +
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sachin Srivastava 2016-01-20 10:36:28 Error in Update and Set statement
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2016-01-20 03:06:10 Re: Recurring and non recurring events.