Re: Slides for PGCon2016; "FTS is dead ? Long live FTS !"

On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 8:53 PM, Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas(at)visena(dot)com>
wrote:

> På søndag 29. mai 2016 kl. 19:49:06, skrev Oleg Bartunov <
> obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>
> [snip]
>>
>> I want to run 9.6 beta in production right now because of this:-)
>>
>
> wait-wait :) We'd be happy to have feedback from production, of course,
> but please, wait a bit. We are adding support of sorting posting list/tree
> not by item pointer as in gin, but make use of additional information, for
> example, timestamp, which will provide additional speedup to the existing
> one.
>
>
> Awesome!
>
>
>
> Also, we are sure there are some bugs :)
>
>
> He he, I reported 1st issue: https://github.com/postgrespro/rum/issues/1
>
> Would be cool to see this fixed so I actually could have a sip of the
> rum:-)
>

It's not easy to fix this. We don't want rum depends on btree_gin, so
probably the easiest way is to have separate operator <=> in rum.

>
> --
> *Andreas Joseph Krogh*
> CTO / Partner - Visena AS
> Mobile: +47 909 56 963
> andreas(at)visena(dot)com
> www.visena.com
> <https://www.visena.com>
>
>