Re: 9.6 -> 10.0

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Peter Geoghegan <
peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> > It's important to remember that PR strategy and engineering truth have
> > only a passing acquaintance. While we don't want to promote vaporware,
> > we do sometimes soft-pedal our own features to our project's detriment.
> > In the current atomosphere of VC-funded hype, we'd do a bit better to
> > trumpet our accomplishements early and often.
>
> I see what you mean.
>
> The question must be asked: What feature *would* meet that "major
> version bump" standard? If it's not extensive parallelism, then I
> don't know what else it could be.
>

Built-in HA Cluster. Hope to discuss it on PGCon. I thought about release
10 in the context of cluster.

>
> --
> Regards,
> Peter Geoghegan
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-advocacy mailing list (pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-advocacy
>