Re: GIN indexed unique constraint?

From: Allan Kamau <kamauallan(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres General Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: GIN indexed unique constraint?
Date: 2021-06-27 19:39:22
Message-ID: CAF3N6oTLtaveVewwYHZky6Mvd+5+TOLjzg1vFq1CSOx4zF09RA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 9:41 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> "David G. Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 11:18 AM Allan Kamau <kamauallan(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >> Is it possible to declare a UNIQUE constraint that uses GIN indexing?
>
> > Doesn't seem to be possible. The btree_gin extension would provide the
> > necessary code but it states explicitly that:
> > "... and they lack one major feature of the standard B-tree code: the
> > ability to enforce uniqueness."
>
> GIN stores all the component elements of its input values separately.
> It'd be tremendously hard even to identify which inputs share exactly
> the same component elements; let alone whether inputs sharing the
> same elements should be considered "equal". For example, ARRAY[1,2]
> and ARRAY[2,1] would give rise to identical sets of index entries in
> a GIN array_ops index.
>
> In short, no, this isn't something you do with a GIN index.
>
> regards, tom lane
>

Thank you David and Tom for your speedy and informative responses.

Allan.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ray O'Donnell 2021-06-27 22:41:09 Overlapping timestamptz ranges with priority
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-06-27 18:41:09 Re: GIN indexed unique constraint?