| From: | Joseph Ferguson <joe(at)infosiftr(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Postgres-Docker Mailing List <pgsql-pkg-docker(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Branches and versions |
| Date: | 2014-07-15 15:47:01 |
| Message-ID: | CAF3-kPGW+Jcv+gKZ28LSvT338B0q-gcnx26u0FuoagCjwa8x9g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-pkg-docker |
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> All:
>
> Currently there's one branch, REL9_3_4. I'd like to change that.
>
> Here's my thinking:
>
> 1) I'd like to backtrack to version 9.2.
>
> 2) I think we should only offer the current minor version of each
> Postgres major version. Therefore we'd have:
>
> REL9_3 (9.3.4)
> REL9_2 (9.2.8)
> BETA9_4 (9.4b1)
>
> Does this make sense?
Yes, this would be fairly simple and would also give us a chance to
drop the branch with all of the source. Would it make more sense to
just delete the current docker-library/postgres repo and create a new
one with the same name (rather than just deleting the branch)?
- Joe Ferguson :: joe(at)infosiftr(dot)com
InfoSiftr :: Vice President of Programming
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tianon Gravi | 2014-07-15 15:55:57 | Re: Branches and versions |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2014-07-14 23:19:26 | Branches and versions |