From: | Jing Wang <jingwangian(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Support to COMMENT ON DATABASE CURRENT_DATABASE |
Date: | 2018-01-25 02:15:09 |
Message-ID: | CAF3+xMJaiCeyDsSx=4nYCg5G3BjVR6xgV2=_95O2G3OsR8MQrA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>Not surprisingly, this patch no longer applies in the wake of commit
>b3f840120. Rather than rebasing the pg_dump portions, I would suggest
>you just drop them.
It has been removed from the pg_dump codes.
>I notice some other patch application failures in dbcommands.c,
>objectaddress.c, and user.c, so there's more work to do besides
>this
Yes. fixed it.
Enclosed please find the latest patch fixed above.
Regards,
Jing Wang
Fujitsu Australia
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
support_CURRENT_DATABASE_keyword_v4.7.patch | application/octet-stream | 53.9 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-01-25 02:49:37 | Further cleanup of pg_dump/pg_restore item selection code |
Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2018-01-25 02:11:57 | Re: non-bulk inserts and tuple routing |