Re: refactoring basebackup.c

From: Suraj Kharage <suraj(dot)kharage(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Dipesh Pandit <dipesh(dot)pandit(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: refactoring basebackup.c
Date: 2020-06-30 06:19:34
Message-ID: CAF1DzPUg+JmL4Vr221ucBKzq-WhOZb7Zu2Xd5-D4ToxqQNhvjQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 10:45 AM Dipesh Pandit <dipesh(dot)pandit(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have repeated the experiment with 8K block size and found that the
> results are not varying much after applying the patch.
> Please find the details below.
>
>
> Later I connected with Suraj to validate the experiment details and found
> that the setup and steps followed are exactly the same in this
> experiment when compared with the previous experiment.
>
>
Thanks Dipesh.
It looks like the results are not varying much with your run as you
followed the same steps.
One of my run with 8kb which took more time than others might be because of
noise at that time.

--
--

Thanks & Regards,
Suraj kharage,

edbpostgres.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2020-06-30 06:47:56 warnings for invalid function casts
Previous Message movead.li@highgo.ca 2020-06-30 05:57:40 Re: A patch for get origin from commit_ts.