| From: | Ivan Voras <ivoras(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Catalog bloat (again) |
| Date: | 2016-01-27 23:37:54 |
| Message-ID: | CAF-QHFVNbfEvpkAXAYs=oDJcYtHnsLCGmk86oD44mWreNM6YHg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 28 January 2016 at 00:13, Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jan 2016 23:54:37 +0100
> Ivan Voras <ivoras(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > So, question #1: WTF? How could this happen, on a regularly vacuumed
> > system? Shouldn't the space be reused, at least after a VACUUM? The issue
> > here is not the absolute existence of the bloat space, it's that it's
> > constantly growing for *system* tables.
>
> With a lot of activity, once a day probably isn't regular enough.
>
>
I sort of see what you are saying. I'm curious, though, what goes wrong
with the following list of expectations:
1. Day-to-day load is approximately the same
2. So, at the end of the first day there will be some amount of bloat
3. Vacuum will mark that space re-usable
4. Within the next day, this space will actually be re-used
5. ... so the bloat won't grow.
Basically, I'm wondering why is it growing after vacuums, not why it exists
in the first place?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Don Parris | 2016-01-28 00:26:52 | Re: Multi-Table Insert/Update Strategy - Use Functions/Procedures? |
| Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2016-01-27 23:24:32 | Re: Multi-Table Insert/Update Strategy - Use Functions/Procedures? |