From: | Alban Hertroys <haramrae(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | depesz(at)depesz(dot)com |
Cc: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Strange problem with create table as select * from table; |
Date: | 2011-11-03 14:19:36 |
Message-ID: | CAF-3MvP5H2pdHy+DWK5KHpzp2rRjbr-4qg+cDj7e5bYgZSEVLA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On 3 November 2011 15:15, hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com> wrote:
>> Do the xobject_id values have other negative numbers or is -1 just a special
>> case? The only thing I can think of is a corrupted index on xobject_id.
>
> minimal xobject_id in source table is 1000.
>
> index on xobject_id might be corrupted, but it doesn't explain that I
> don't see duplicates with group_by/having query on xobjects, which uses
> seqscan:
Actually, it does. A sequential scan doesn't use the index.
--
If you can't see the forest for the trees,
Cut the trees and you'll see there is no forest.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | hubert depesz lubaczewski | 2011-11-03 14:21:42 | Re: Strange problem with create table as select * from table; |
Previous Message | hubert depesz lubaczewski | 2011-11-03 14:15:22 | Re: Strange problem with create table as select * from table; |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | hubert depesz lubaczewski | 2011-11-03 14:21:42 | Re: Strange problem with create table as select * from table; |
Previous Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2011-11-03 14:18:52 | Re: removing =>(text, text) in 9.2 |