| From: | Alban Hertroys <haramrae(at)gmail(dot)com> | 
|---|---|
| To: | depesz(at)depesz(dot)com | 
| Cc: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | Re: Strange problem with create table as select * from table; | 
| Date: | 2011-11-03 14:19:36 | 
| Message-ID: | CAF-3MvP5H2pdHy+DWK5KHpzp2rRjbr-4qg+cDj7e5bYgZSEVLA@mail.gmail.com | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers | 
On 3 November 2011 15:15, hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com> wrote:
>> Do the xobject_id values have other negative numbers or is -1 just a special
>> case? The only thing I can think of is a corrupted index on xobject_id.
>
> minimal xobject_id in source table is 1000.
>
> index on xobject_id might be corrupted, but it doesn't explain that I
> don't see duplicates with group_by/having query on xobjects, which uses
> seqscan:
Actually, it does. A sequential scan doesn't use the index.
-- 
If you can't see the forest for the trees,
Cut the trees and you'll see there is no forest.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | hubert depesz lubaczewski | 2011-11-03 14:21:42 | Re: Strange problem with create table as select * from table; | 
| Previous Message | hubert depesz lubaczewski | 2011-11-03 14:15:22 | Re: Strange problem with create table as select * from table; | 
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | hubert depesz lubaczewski | 2011-11-03 14:21:42 | Re: Strange problem with create table as select * from table; | 
| Previous Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2011-11-03 14:18:52 | Re: removing =>(text, text) in 9.2 |