From: | Alban Hertroys <haramrae(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Gregg Jaskiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: table spaces |
Date: | 2013-03-13 09:38:39 |
Message-ID: | CAF-3MvP=WDgRSdGJMtmz1thSm3RsV8hnHGTSt03TrBmOXTdVUg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 12 March 2013 22:31, Gregg Jaskiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Ok,
>
> So by that token (more drives the better), I should have raid 5 (or
> whichever will work) with all 6 drives in it ?
>
Raid 5 is usually advised against, as in many scenarios it won't perform
very well. For example, see:
http://www.revsys.com/writings/postgresql-performance.html
--
If you can't see the forest for the trees,
Cut the trees and you'll see there is no forest.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Charl Roux | 2013-03-13 10:59:34 | C++Builder table exist |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2013-03-13 09:11:38 | Re: orafce |