Re: table spaces

From: Alban Hertroys <haramrae(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Gregg Jaskiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: table spaces
Date: 2013-03-13 09:38:39
Message-ID: CAF-3MvP=WDgRSdGJMtmz1thSm3RsV8hnHGTSt03TrBmOXTdVUg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 12 March 2013 22:31, Gregg Jaskiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Ok,
>
> So by that token (more drives the better), I should have raid 5 (or
> whichever will work) with all 6 drives in it ?
>

Raid 5 is usually advised against, as in many scenarios it won't perform
very well. For example, see:
http://www.revsys.com/writings/postgresql-performance.html
--
If you can't see the forest for the trees,
Cut the trees and you'll see there is no forest.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Charl Roux 2013-03-13 10:59:34 C++Builder table exist
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2013-03-13 09:11:38 Re: orafce