From: | Alban Hertroys <haramrae(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Mamatha_Kagathi_Chan(at)dell(dot)com |
Cc: | ringerc(at)ringerc(dot)id(dot)au, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [pgadmin-support] Help for Migration |
Date: | 2011-12-07 09:26:22 |
Message-ID: | CAF-3MvNcUWFOu-L8AKs7df93Z1UB8o7PwW692Z7ax14_87fV7g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-support pgsql-general |
On 7 December 2011 10:08, <Mamatha_Kagathi_Chan(at)dell(dot)com> wrote:
> The procedure definition is
> CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE
> -- So I am not calling a function but a procedure.
I don't think CREATE PROCEDURE is actually a valid command in
Postgres. The 9.0 documentation seems to confirm that
(http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/sql-commands.html)
In Postgres, "procedures" are void-returning functions - there's no
difference. It's just a naming convention.
Perhaps you're using some 3rd party code for MS-SQL compatibility? I
imagine CREATE PROCEDURE would then be a simple wrapper around CREATE
FUNCTION ... RETURNING void.
Heh, didn't know you could define DEFAULT argument values like that,
but it seems you can!
--
If you can't see the forest for the trees,
Cut the trees and you'll see there is no forest.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mamatha_Kagathi_Chan | 2011-12-07 09:44:14 | Re: [pgadmin-support] Help for Migration |
Previous Message | Mamatha_Kagathi_Chan | 2011-12-07 09:08:17 | Re: [pgadmin-support] Help for Migration |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andre Lopes | 2011-12-07 09:27:06 | Queries take long long(10 sec.) time running |
Previous Message | Mamatha_Kagathi_Chan | 2011-12-07 09:08:17 | Re: [pgadmin-support] Help for Migration |